We have come to accept cancer as unstoppable, incurable and even a natural part of life.
This way of looking at things is tragic since cancer is not a natural process and can be prevented. Shocking to most people is that it is scientifically proven that the disease is genetically recessive, not dominant. In fact, the human body is highly resistant to cancer. In 1969, Professor Henry Harris of Oxford University shook the cancer research community, it has demonstrated that these theories are not true. Professor Harris took normal tissue cells and infused into these three types of cancer. Surely, he thought, the cancer cells would eventually win the usual ones, will "transform" into cancer cells. Surprisingly, however, the cells have developed normally.
Contrary to popular opinion, it takes decades for cancer to develop in humans. Due to the long incubation periods, science can show us how to destroy any form of initial precancerous cells and cancerous prevent degradation produces widespread.
If you believe in the existence of a genetic basis of cancer, then think again once. Dr. Robert A. Weinberg of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the leading cancer researchers and discoverer of the so-called oncogenes (cancer-causing gene) completely changed the conclusions reached after discovering that " less than one in a million DNA base appears to be copied wrong ". This is not a defect! His exact words are: "Something was very wrong. The notion that a cancer develops through a series of successive activation of oncogenes has lost touch with reality. "He called the genetic discoveries made up to that point as" sterile ". Therefore, the primary cause of cancer is not genetic. This was announced in 1998. Have you heard of him? Probably not.
In 2006, leaders of the largest cancer research center in Houston, Texas, announced that cancer's prime cause is not genetic: "If it could have happened [solving cancer with genetics] would have already solved through genetic mutations, "said William Brinkley, one of the vice-presidents from Baylor who says other research should take precedence over the cancer genome project... Dr. John Mendelsohn [president of the Center for cancer MD Anderson] says, "Any claims that this [genetic research] will be the key to curing cancer are not appropriate."
The primary cause of cancer is not a genetic mutation. Even if "there is cancer in your family," there is real hope. Unfortunately, the geneticists have it back, trying to force the facts to fit their genetics-based theories when they do not fit the facts, because, as Professor Harris demonstrated many years ago, cancer is not genetically dominant. Where does this leave us? Where can we look for solutions? What about the popular nutritional solutions to fighting cancer?
Dr. Otto Warburg's cancer research
Many of my fellow doctors were shocked to discover these truths. How many of us saw these important discoveries reported in the media? Unfortunately, not much. Do not despair because there is an answer to the problem of cancer. It was discovered in 1925 by Otto Warburg, PhD. In medicine. Dr. Warburg was named the greatest biochemist of the twentieth century; the large number and importance of his discoveries qualify him as the most accomplished biochemist of all time.
In the 20s, Dr. Warburg undertook research in respiratory enzymes, certain vitamins and minerals that the body needs to use oxygen to the cells, research that won him the Nobel Prize in 1931. (Today, these vitamins and minerals are referred to as "co-enzyme".)
The Nobel Committee assigned medicine was expected to benefit from vital discoveries about cancer of Dr. Otto Warburg. Unfortunately, politics intervened and cancer was not removed.
Despite its early successes and honors, Dr Warburg continued to make fundamental discoveries even in his last years of life, thus totaling a career of 60 years of research with stunning results. In addition, Dr. Warburg often created new tools for his research. For example, he discovered a way to measure the pressure of oxygen in a living cell by developing a special gauge - an important development that led to his discovery: that pressure and lower oxygen concentration always predict cancer.
Dr. Warburg achievements are to be isolated functional main cause cancer. Rather than working on a theoretical level, too far removed from the realities of cancer physiological to be able to provide practical therapies and preventive programs, he described the actual conditions and causes cancer cells establishes, and thus gave others the opportunity to further develop practical ways to stop cancer growth.
It is unbelievable that no principle of his many important discoveries have been used by the American research community in preventing and treating cancer and stopping remission. Despite some debate on the direction and validity of Warburg doctor work, no scientist or researcher has ever disproved the validity, correctness or applicability of these important discoveries in cancer prevention and treatment. Even today, medical consensus often has little to do with science. The policy has squandered the efforts of many researchers in the cancer field.
The main cause of cancer
We got used so much to be told that "someday" we discover what causes cancer and that is the greatest mystery of modern medicine that what follows may seem hard to believe.
Dr. Otto Warburg discovered and clearly stated that the main and most important cause of cancer is too little oxygen enters the cell. "The experiments we find that 35% inhibition of oxygen respiration already sufficient to entail such a transformation during cell growth," he said in 1966 at a conference of Nobel Laureates in Lindau, Germany.
Relying on meticulous experiments that he and many others have been verified many times, Dr. Warburg discovered and stated that the main and the number one cause of cancer is too little oxygen getting into the cell (hypoxia).
Once a cell becomes cancerous, it cannot return to normal; must be destroyed (Science 1956; 123 (3191)).
When I first encountered this information did not come to believe. To my amazement, the information on the link between cancer and oxygen have been published many times in recent cancer, ex. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1993; 26 (1): 45-50 and 1999; 53: 113-17. However, the practical solution to solve the problem of oxygen deficiency has escaped researchers - probably because they did not know where to start.
Taking hydrogen peroxide, calcium supplements, fish oil supplements, massive amounts of omega-3, ozone or so-called "hydrogen peroxide" will not solve the deficiency of oxygen at the cell level. Nobody has been able until now to carry forward the discovery Dr. Warburg.
This lack of understanding explains many of the misunderstood biochemical activities related to cancer that waste precious time and not actually lead anywhere. Only anti-cancer discovery of Dr. Warburg predict many real life results that have not been explained until now.
Dr Warburg's discovery has been verified many times, both by transforming normal cells into cancer cells and by demonstrating that the disease does not develop into well-oxygenated areas. Surprisingly, American physicians who conclusively proved it in 1953 and confirmed it in 1955! Goldblatt and Cameron were observed (pg. 535) (J. Experimental Medicine 1953; 97: 535-552) that once were to the cell damage is too great, no amount of oxygen will return to a normal cell respiration: this It is forever doomed to a cancerous life.
Therefore, prevention is the ultimate solution to never contracting cancer. They confirmed opportunity to prevent a precancerous cell due to "breathing influence" carcinogenic to become permanent if oxygen deficiency is stopped early enough.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu